Wednesday, February 23, 2011
New Trades
Purchasing Petrobras Preferred vs Common
"Hey Scott,
What do you think about petrobras? They seem to have ordinary and preferred shares that you can buy. It is trading at about half of its all time high and up more than 2% today. I am interetsed in understanding ordinary vs preferred shares and why you would want to own one over the other. Another thing I like about this is ordinary shares are paying over a 4% div."
- The preferred/common stock can be tricky when looking at yahoo or google finance. They are not exactly right and it is worth to look at the companies 10-k. If you look at google finance it says that the company pays out .24 cents in dividend with a yield of 4.32% - this is wrong. ($.24 * 4)/36.68 = over 2%. Thus, .24 cents per quarter divided by the current price is over a 2% yield, not 4%. Google finance yield is incorrect. Looking at my brokerage account I got paid approx. $98 last year in div from PBR which divided by 100 shares is .98 cents - approx. the same as what google finance states. Meaning, the yield is actually the 2%.
- I'm not sure how much you know about preferred vs common, but her are some simple rules - sorry if I bore you. 1) Preferred gets dividends paid to them before common stock so if PBR cuts dividend then obviously shareholders don't get paid where PBR.A must pay dividend, 2) Preferred is higher on the latter in capital structure so if the company went into default the preferred holders are more senior and get paid out before the common holders, 3) Preferred stock holders do not have shareholder rights and do not get to vote as such 4) There is less liquidity with preferred stock (not a problem for minions like us).
- I remember back in 2008 people recommending preferred stocks because of their seniority and interest payments -If a preferred share dividend is missed, the dividends missed are accumulated and must be paid in full prior to any common dividends being paid. SO, if it says it will pay you a dividend it will - unless they go bankrupt and you get lucky enough where they liquidate and you still get some cash from the sale of assets.
- From my analysis, there is almost no difference in the dividend amount (PBR vs PBR.A), meaning I BELIEVE it is the same .24 cents whether you own common or preferred in this case. However, the div. yield will be different. Currently the pref. shares trail the common so you have a higher yield. That is the added benefit, you can control more shares with the same amount of capital thus getting paid a higher dividend - this is the key with preferred. You should expect not as much capital appreciation because of its higher yield - this is usually the catch with preferred but not always. Example, PBR was down YTD 23.07% while PBR.A (pref) was down 22.36%, over 10 years PBR was up 481% while PBR.A was up 378%. You can see the difference long term.
- My suggestion would be are your goals in 1) investment income or 2) capital gains? With 200 shares of PBR you get about 222 shares of PBR.A- so sbout $22 a more year in div. You're decision if you execute on Petrobras, but it may be worth the pref. because you can control more shares and the % returns have been similar. 5 yr returns between the two differ by only 1%.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Market Correction or Trend Continuing?
I expect to sell more stocks while seeing the market continue to trend higher - market trends are very powerful but I don't expect to pick the top so no doubt money will be left on the table.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Buffett Interview with FCIC Staff
Warren Buffett Interview With FCIC (May 26, 2010)
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
FCIC formed to write a report on Financial Crisis
- Buffett purchased Dunn & BradStreet in 1999 which later spun off Moody’s (Buffett has not made any purchases in Moody’s since then)
- Single most important factor in evaluating a business is pricing power
- Moody’s has/had a duopoly – other competitor could come in and cut prices in half and it wouldn’t change Moody’s business.
- Cause of crises was 50% reality and 50% psychology - imbedded in belief that housing price couldn’t go down.
o People buy into a sound premise. People later forget the original sound premise and focus on prices.
o Bubble occurred b/c housing was easiest asset class to borrow against and peoples largest asset.
o This crises will be remembered along with South Sea Bubble.
o Thinks every aspect of society, including rating agencies, contributed to crisis.
- He was wrong in not selling Moody’s before Financial Crisis
- Ben Graham made an observation 50 years ago. People can get in more trouble in investing with a sound premise then a false premise.
o There was a premise that common stocks will always perform better then bonds.
o Book in 1924 by Edgar Lawrence Smith of study of common stocks vs bonds. His idea was that bonds would outperform in deflation and stocks outperform during inflation. He found that actually common stocks always outperformed. This was because there is a retained earnings factor, when dividend yield on stocks was the same as bonds and with retained earnings factor, stocks outperformed. This became idea for 1929 bubble.
o However, this was the case only when stocks and bonds had same yield that they would outperform going forward. What happened was people heard this and everyone got into stocks driving prices up and yields down, so bond yields actually became higher. Original premise was forgotten and price action took over.
- Housing was the same idea – premise was that houses will become worth more over time b/c dollar becomes worth less i.e. house bought 40 years ago worth more today. So it was a sound premise to buy a house that may cost more next year, and you can finance it. Soon price action takes over and premise gets twisted.
- When original premise is forgotten, price action takes over peoples minds. B/C housing was single largest asset class, $22 trillion, it was understandable to the public, thus created a bubble like we’ve never seen.
- 1999 Bubble: When your neighbor is buying internet stocks and getting rich your wife starts saying , why is he making all this money your smarter then he is, this leads to day trading, etc… and price action taking over in internet stocks.
- Buffett sold all his holdings in 2000 of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
o He was concerned with management at both firms. Management said they could increase EPS in low double-digit range. This meant to Buffett that there would be trouble b/c no one can proclaim this. This meant management may something in operations or accounting that could be unsound to meat this expectation.
o FMae/FMac made an investment in Philip Morris bonds. They are dealing with essentially gov guaranteed credit. The company is serving gov and investors. Using their power to make money not related to corporate mission. They were “arbitraging the government credit.” Buffet found one cockroach and new there were more. This concerned him about what else these companies could be doing that he didn’t know about.
- The reason stock markets do well is they have a 3-day settlement period. Derivatives have a very long settlement period – this is very hard to predict the behavior of someone else, for example 100 years from now. As derivatives became more and more pervasive and more dramatic they increased risk. Let people engage in massive mischief. This along with minimum money put up and maximum leverage.
- Investing vs speculation. Difference is the intent of a person engaging in transaction. Investment operation is where you look at the asset itself to lay out some money now and get more money back later. Look at what it will produce. Committing funds now to get more funds later through the operation of the asset. Speculation - focused on the price action of the stock. You are counting on for example, an increase in quarterly earnings or a div. increase etc, but you are not looking at the performance of the asset. The real questions is, do you care where the market will go? If you care if the stock market is open tomorrow then you care about the price action.
o Gambling propensity with people is huge. People fly thousands of miles to a desert to do things that are mathematically against them.
o Gambling is encouraged by the state with lotteries that have terrible odds. This is why bells and whistles go off in casinos so people can see winners around them and feel that they too can be winners.
- “I have a model in my mind when making investments”, Buffett
- “Anybody investing in something that is opaque should run away, whether that is common stocks or inventions.” - Buffett
- What caused the bubble to really blow up was incentives. Incentive structure was also messed up during Internet bubble. i.e. someone said 20,000 eye balls equals $100,000.
- Once leveraged was loosened it allow the Internet and housing bubble to expand, not as much in Internet bubble though.
- Once you start lending money to ppl where the hope to get money back is if you sell the asset instead of where the asset is used to service the loan, you have a problem. Once you think the asset will go up, you don’t have to look at anything else. This is was happened in Housing Bubble.
- “Owning a home is a way to be short the dollar.” “If a couple can afford it and not pay silly prices in terms of replacement value, I would say buy it. But I wouldn’t say buy 3 more or buy it with 50% leverage.” - Buffett
- “ The vast majority of [Berkshire] short term money is in T-bonds. Not any other better option. We don’t know what will happen tomorrow. In 1914 the government closed stock market for many months.” – Buffett
- “If troubles are brewing the government should error on the side of overkill.” Buffett referring to government injecting money into the system.
- Currently, Europe is in a different situation than the US. Only the government could save us in the USA. We were only trying to save ourselves, for example we weren’t trying to also save Mexico. Europe has a system where a group of ppl will have to help another group. A group will have to put up a lot of money to help another group who haven’t behaved the way they should have.
- The problem develops because ppl thought currencies were all equal with Euro in different countries. PPL realized that really Euroes in each country really aren’t the same. No one has to buy a Greek bond for example, ppl will buy US bonds tomorrow because we have a US bank that is in sync with the country. No one in Greece has the power to do this, like US does.
- It was asked if Warren has any books he recommends about the Crisis. Buffett recommends a book that doesn’t exist - he would write his own story starting with Ken Lewis answering the phone to save Merrill. The book would go from there forward.
- He likes Sorkin’s book on the Crises. (This is the “Too Big To Fail” Book)
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Portfolio Returns

Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Why this is not another Value Investing Blog
I am not trying to recreate the value investing/personal finance blog wheel, so there will seldom be sections on "top value investors," "best finance books," "timeless articles," etc... This is simply a place where I can write about trades I've made and the analysis I went through. Frequently, there will be posts about places to get ideas, checklists I go thru, and articles that may help me become a better investor.
I will try not write about old positions or knowledge I've gained that has proved helpful- the blog will best be served as forward looking. Still, I hope others may stumble across here and find some insight or ideas that can enhance their own strategies.
Mentors of whom I've not met but I continue to learn from will be referenced many times here: Seth Klarman, Warren Buffett, Monish Pabrai, Charlie Munger, Chris Browne, Sardar Biglari, Donald Smith & Co, & Leucadia.